Political

Molokai and Hawaii – Island Politics

Connecting The Drops

Monday, March 16th, 2009

The future of Molokai’s water is top concern for advisory committee.
By Sean Aronson

As Molokai residents plan for the future of this island, preservation of native resources is at the top of the list.  This includes having animals to hunt and plants to eat. But it all begins with water.

A small group of concerned citizens gathered last week to hear the presentation of a water plan for Molokai.  The proposal will be submitted to the Maui County Department of Water Supply (MDWS) sometime this summer.  It will then go to the Maui County Council, where it may be adopted as official policy for the next twenty years.

Carl Freedman, a consultant working for the MDWS, presented a draft of his strategy.  His work is heavily influenced by the outcome of the Molokai Water Working Group, a group that met seven times over the course of a year to address water concerns on the island.  That body issued their report in May of 2008.

The Recreational Renaissance

Monday, March 9th, 2009

State plan for recreational resource improvement comes to Molokai

By Catherine Cluett

Molokai hasn’t been forgotten in the state’s newest plan for improvement of recreational areas – the island is slated to receive $4,490,000 for three projects on the island between now and 2013. A total of $240 million has been allocated for a statewide “Recreational Renaissance,” a revamping of recreational facilities of both land and sea.

A group of Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) representatives visited Molokai last week on their state-wide tour, asking for community support for the project. Edward Underwood, Administrator of the Division of Boating and Aquatic Recreation, says the Recreational Renaissance plan needs community support in order for the bills to pass through legislature.

Molokai Bills Reach Senate Floor

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

By Molokai Dispatch Staff

Last Friday was a busy day for legislation relating to Molokai.  Four bills passed the Senate’s Water, Land, Agriculture and Hawaiian Affairs Committee (WLT) last Friday.  The Committee is chaired by former Molokai resident Senator Clayton Hee.

Issues as far ranging as fisheries protection and a ban on genetically modified taro were addressed by the six member committee.  Additionally, many Molokai residents offered testimony on the various bills.

The bills will be up for senate approval in the coming weeks.

Fisheries

Bill SB1199, which would designate the waters around Molokai as a community-based subsistence fishing area, passed out the Senate’s Water, Land, Agriculture and Hawaiian Affairs Committee (WLT) last Friday.

The View from Outside

Sunday, March 1st, 2009

You can’t be critical of Molokai without knowing its people.

I recently had a discussion with a colleague about the social situation on Moloka‘i. Actually, that’s just one way to characterize it. Another would be that I had a heated exchange with a guy who showed his ignorance by expressing some deeply-held prejudices about Moloka‘i and its people. It wasn’t pretty.

I’ll be the first to admit that Moloka‘i isn’t perfect; none of us would claim that it is. There could be more jobs and less crime. The economy could be stronger. We could have more doctors and fewer residents who rely on drugs and alcohol to get through the day. Food and gas could be cheaper. There could be more ways for young people to use their time.

Yet we all know that we could say the same thing about every community in our state, and probably our nation. Yes, Moloka‘i has been hit hard. Everybody has.

The danger comes when people outside Moloka‘i try to take the acknowledged challenges and extend them into a criticism of the entire community and all of its residents.

You can’t know Moloka‘i until you have spent real time in the community, met the real people who choose to make it their home, seen how they live and work and play. Moloka‘i isn’t about high gas prices and closing businesses any more than Honolulu is about traffic and high rise condominiums. Every community is a reflection of complex personal interactions and common choices. And every part of our state—whatever the average income or style of the homes—reflects in varying degrees a willingness to share the sorrows as well as the joys that form the backdrop of our lives.

I have met many people on Moloka‘i who have the warmest hearts and most generous souls you will find anywhere. Almost everyone I have encountered there has made a commitment to making the island and our state a better place to raise children and support our families. And every person on Moloka‘i has earned the respect and support of our community and our government. No amount of pontificating can rob the island and its residents of their right to guide their own destiny.

In fairness, we should remember that the blade cuts both ways. Some of us find ourselves accusing O‘ahu residents of being Honolulu-centric, of not caring for the different values and lifestyles of those who choose to live on other islands. While I am sure that those views sometimes hold true, I have found in most cases that most individuals who truly care for Hawai‘i—including my colleagues in the legislature—make a sincere effort to consider the varied experiences and choices of our state’s residents.

Maybe my opinionated friend was having an unfortunate mental hiccup. It is possible that under other circumstances he would have chosen his words more wisely and expressed himself less provocatively. It is probably fairest for all of us to look beyond this single episode and forgive his unfounded blanket-condemnation of Moloka‘i.

Protecting the ‘aina is a priority for Maui Representative

Sunday, February 22nd, 2009

When the Hawai‘i Supreme Court ordered that there be an injunction to prevent the State from selling “ceded lands” from the public land trust last year, the Justices correctly acknowledged the State’s fiduciary duty to preserve those lands until the unrelinquished claims of Native Hawaiians have been resolved.

The Hawai‘i Supreme Court, citing the 1993 Apology Resolution by Congress as well as State legislation, said that given the crucial importance of the ‘aina to the Native Hawaiian people and their culture, their religion, their economic self-sufficiency, and their sense of personal and community well-being, any further diminishment of the “ceded lands” from the public lands trust will negatively impact the contemplated reconciliation and settlement efforts between native Hawaiians and the State.

It is imperative not just for native Hawaiians, but all of Hawai‘i’s people that a moratorium on the selling of “ceded lands” remain in place to preserve this process of reconciliation.

As Chairwoman of the House Hawaiian Affairs Committee and Chairwoman of the Legislative Hawaiian Caucus, which consists of six State Senators and 22 State Representatives, I have kept an open and transparent discussion to educate lawmakers on the cultural, emotional, and inherent significance of these “ceded lands” to the Hawaiian people.

In late January 2009, the Caucus supported a full moratorium on the selling of “ceded lands” and introduced a bill that became the Caucus’ priority as part of a legislative package.

I have also provided an ongoing forum through the Caucus “Kukakuka” meetings as well as heard and passed out measures to address the moratorium issue, which involved the public in the discourse and allowed lawmakers to hear arguments from different sides of the “ceded lands” debate.

With the start of the 2009 Legislative Session, I’ve had discussions with Gov. Linda Lingle, Attorney General Mark Bennett, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Chair Micah Kane, Office of Hawaiian Affairs Trustees Haunani Apoliana, Walter Heen, Oswald Ostender, Collette Machado, and Robert Lindsey, OHA’s Administrator Clyde Namu‘o as well as OHA’s attorney Bill Maheula, regarding the appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on “ceded lands.”

Other members of the Hawaiian community who I had discussions with about the moratorium are the Royal Order of Kamehameha Ali‘i Nui Clifford Hashimoto and members, Hawai‘i attorney Sherry Broder, The Reinstated Hawaiian Government Prime Minister Henry Noa, Aha Kiole Representatives, Association of Hawaiian Civics Clubs President Leimomi Kahn, Hula Kumu Vicky Takamine-Holt of Iliuokalani and many, many others.

The legislative fight for a moratorium is one that has united kupuna, native Hawaiians, lawmakers, communities, and activists from across the state. The resounding support to bar the selling of “ceded lands” until the reconciliation process can take place is not simply there to institute a legal measure. The powerful emotions and voices that have emerged from our Kukakuka with Hawai‘i’s community reflect the willingness of Hawai‘i’s people to continue to move forward with this healing process and to protect the lands for future generations.

A Bright Idea?

Monday, February 16th, 2009

Proposed amendment would allow solar energy on agricultural land.
By Sean Aronson

On the surface, increasing the number of solar panels on Molokai would seem to be a no-brainer – nearly everyone is on board to reduce Hawaii’s dependence on fossil fuels --but things are rarely as simple as they appear.

Placing solar panels on agricultural land presents complex and possibly dangerous situations, at least according to several concerned Molokai residents.

“Even issues that appear black and white are not,” says Molokai kupuna Judy Caparita. “Everything is much trickier than we are led to believe.”

The Resolution
Caparita gave public testimony last week before the Molokai Planning Commission (MoPC).

Running Out of Gas

Monday, February 16th, 2009

Kalaupapa faces fuel shortage, imposes rationing for entire community.
By Sean Aronson

Residents of Kalaupapa may not have far to go when it comes to driving in this small area, yet they are facing a gas crisis.

That’s because they are using gas at a faster rate than their fuel storage can support.  At their current usage, they will run out by June – more than a month before the annual barge is set to bring more.

Kalaupapa, a peninsula of just a dozen square miles or so with less than 10 miles of road, is home to about a hundred people.  For such a small population, though, there does seem to be a lot of vehicles.  And residents think nothing of getting in their car to visit neighbors just a short distance away.

“We’ve got to change our habits,” says acting administrator Tim Richmond.

Fishing for Answers

Monday, February 16th, 2009

Community discusses amendments to fisheries regulations

By Catherine Cluett

Marine life is one of Hawaii’s most treasured resources. With Molokai’s dependence on subsistence living, preservation of resources like the island’s fisheries becomes all the more vital to every day life. But many have noticed a decline in the quality and quantity of marine resources around the state, and it’s a complaint the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) is trying to solve by talking to communities throughout the Hawaiian Islands and soliciting their input in a proposal to amend existing fishing regulations.

Bill Puleloa, an aquatic biologist with DLNR, visited the Governor’s Molokai Community Advisory Council last week to get some answers from Molokai residents about how to best manage, conserve and restore the island’s marine resources.

Hawaii in Legal Spotlight

Monday, February 9th, 2009

Ceded lands case headed to US Supreme Court at the end of the month.
By Sean Aronson

The United States Supreme Court in Washington, DC may be far away, but it will soon tackle an issue close to home for Molokai residents – ceded lands.  The highest court in the land will address whether the State of Hawaii has the jurisdiction to sell lands that remain in dispute.

And the timing could not be more interesting.  2009 marks the 50th anniversary of Hawaii statehood.  All this less than a month after Hawaii saw its first son elected president.  This year is shaping up to be one for records, when it comes to Hawaii in the national conversation.

Molokai residents received a briefing on the ceded lands issue this past weekend.  

Not as Crazy as it Looks

Monday, February 9th, 2009

It seems that every session, legislative observers look for unusual bills that eventually get unexpected public attention. Last session it was The Aspartame Bill, this session it may be The Pit Bull Bill. Briefly, The Aspartame Bill would have banned all food products containing the artificial sweetener aspartame, found in such products as diet soft drinks, sugar free gums and candies, and the packaged sweetener Equal. It is known by its brand name, NutraSweet. It didn’t survive.

The Pit Bull Bill, this year’s SB79, would make it a misdemeanor to own or sell a pit bull dog. It has been getting fresh attention because of some recent incidents on O‘ahu involving pit bull bites. Needless to say, many of us have gotten calls and emails from people on both sides of the issue, some of whom thought the bill has already passed. It hasn’t, and it has little chance of making it very far.
Whatever these bills’ individual merits, their introduction and progress through the session offer important lessons on the legislative process and community involvement.

First, both bills show how residents with particular concerns can gain entry into the system. I introduced the aspartame bill last session "by request," as did Senate President Colleen Hanabusa this session with the pit bull bill. “By request” refers to a bill that a group or individual has asked a legislator to introduce, and that the requestor will support through the process.

Hawai‘i law does not include a form of initiative or referendum that allows citizens direct access to the legislative process. As a result, "by request" or "BR" bills represent a rare opportunity for interested citizens to propose legislation. This session, sixteen Senators have introduced over 425 bills by request, covering a broad range of topics. Also among those bills are laws proposed by the Governor’s office, the State Judiciary, and the mayors of Hawai‘i’s four counties.

The fact that a bill may represent an idea outside the public mainstream does not mean it does not warrant introduction. The broader idea behind the aspartame bill was that we need to be attentive to our food supply. The pit bull bill reminded us of our concern for safety, and the fact that we may face unexpected dangers. The bills also illustrate how quickly an idea can enter the public consciousness. Last year the aspartame bill got a hearing, which is not true for every bill introduced. The pit bull bill suddenly seemed prescient when two incidents involving the breed occurred on the very day that a story about the bill appeared in a daily newspaper.

Experience has shown that a new idea can take two to three years to move to the forefront. Perhaps deeper concerns about the quality of our foods and owners’ liability for their animals may be on their way into the broad public consciousness.
The thing to keep in mind is that the process of introducing bills by request gives those with emerging concerns a chance to bring them into the public arena, where they may seem less…unusual…down the road.