Author Archives: Bianca Moragne

Farming at the Center of Molokai’s Identity

Tuesday, August 7th, 2007

Farming at the Center of Molokai’s Identity

Here are some facts to consider: Molokai is unique in that agriculture is one of the main economic engines on the island, a fact stated by Bank of Hawaii Economist Paul Brewbaker at an Economic Summit on Molokai a few years ago. It creates more jobs and more revenue than tourism or any sector other than the service and government sectors. Revenue includes jobs created, services and supplies purchased, taxes, and products processed.

Farming is also the only industry that actually recharges the aquifer by returning most of the water back to the ground. That’s why this industry is so vital to the island. Even more vital are the food crop farmers. In the event this island should experience a disruption in our food supply, we have a better chance of survival on this little island in the middle of the sea.

If agriculture is in such bad shape, then why is it that each year, farmers have to cut back on their water use? This industry is experiencing growing pains. Water has become the major limiting factor in the expansion of agriculture on Molokai and, at over 2200+ acres, has reached its upper limit in the amount of acreage that can be kept in production at any given time, unless innovative ways are developed to conserve water. If agriculture weren’t viable, many farmers would have left Molokai to other islands, where large tracts of land are now available for farming. Even Larry Jefts keeps one foot on Molokai because we still have many competitive advantages over other farming areas.

There are many more opportunities in agriculture to create value-added products. The ‘multiplier effect’ is an economic term used to describe how value is added to a product. For example, fresh sweetpotato has a farm value of 85 cents per pound. Made into chips, its’ retail value jumps to over $15 per pound. Between 85 cents and $15, materials and supplies are purchased, jobs created, and raw materials processed along the way to create this product. All of this creates money for the state in the form on taxes, and also new jobs. This phenomenon is unique to agriculture and manufacturing.

The lifeline to the farming effort is the Molokai Irrigation System, for without it this industry wouldn’t exist. The system was built expressly for the homesteaders, but politics and race played into this decision, and the homesteaders were shortchanged. In order to allow for the construction of the MIS, the state had to set aside land for the non-homesteader, and 1/3 of the water was set aside for them. A land swap ensued, and 1,050 acres of Hawaiian Home Lands south of the airport was swapped with 243 acres in Waianae, considered at that time to be of comparable value. This is how the Molokai Agricultural Park was created.

Today, over 80% of the water is being used by non-homesteaders, and the real concern is when comes time to take the water back to the homesteads for expansion of agriculture, that the water will return without any major repercussions. If we start with a level field where everyone knows the rules, we shouldn’t have a problem.

Molokai Ranch bought out the Kaluakoi Hotel and remaining parcels in 1998, and did so mainly to secure the water from Well 17. They also assumed the agreement with the Department of Agriculture to transmit water from Well 17 in Kualapuu to Kaluakoi. But like its predecessors, Kaluakoi Corporation and Tokyo Kosan, Molokai Ranch has become a bad neighbor. Instead of carrying their own load, they have decided to lean on and take advantage of their neighbor’s goodwill by allowing their pumps to malfunction and fall into disrepair time and again.

This is not an isolated incident. In the last four years alone, from April 2003 to May 2006, the Molokai Ranch pump at Well 17 has broken down a total of 262 days. With the recent June-July 2007 breakdown of 36 days, this amounts to a total of 298 days that their pumps where broken and they weren’t putting water in the reservoir! Why bother when you can take advantage of the good will of your neighbor. The Hawaiian word for this is hana ‘ino. Good neighbors don’t keep leaning on others, and feeding off of them when they’re better off than their neighbors!

Moreover, this is a violation of the transmission agreement, which states that Molokai Ranch must put in water before they take out water, and are not allowed to store water in the reservoir. Molokai Ranch has shown the farmers they cannot be a responsible party to this agreement, which is why its surprising the farmers would even consider allowing this agreement to continue for 5 more years under more stringent conditions.

With all these water shenanigans, it’s quite understandable why homesteaders are so adamant about protecting their water. The above situation is only one reason. They know their Hawaiian Homes rights to this water. They’ve seen with their own eyes, and heard stories of their parents and grandparents struggles, of carrying water to their crops in buckets, of water only being available on certain days, and of droughts where the kupuna resorted to fasting and prayer so the rains would come to feed their parched crops. Of making poi palaoa (flour) and pumpkin poi to stretch the kalo poi when the weather made it difficult to grow or to make ends meet.

These are the things that you hold close to you and don’t take lightly, and they become a part of who you are, but more importantly, you learn from these struggles and experiences, hoping it never happens again, and that you don’t get used again. Red dirt is powdered gold, and the water that nourishes this red dirt is more valuable than gold. Over the last 26 years, I have heard these stories from the people who lived them, including Heine and Becky Mokuau, Johnny Pineapple Keohuloa, Danny and Louise Kekahuna, John Kaimikaua (the grandfather), James Wise, Kuamu Makaiwi Pelekai, my mother in law, Tilden Makaiwi Han, and others. Many of these individuals are gone, but their legacies live in their children, grandchildren, and ohana, many of whom are still farming today.

They grow banana and papaya, green onions, taro, sweetpotato, vegetables and fruits just like their forefather’s. They strive for self-sufficiency and live the dream of Prince Kuhio Kalanianaole in aina ho’opulapula, using their land to feed and teach their families, and produce more to sell. These are examples of perseverance, of resilience, and of beating all odds. These humble beginnings have bore fruit for many families, but they don’t talk about their successes because that’s not the Hawaiian way. They happily share with others, which make them the ‘richest’ people on this island due to their generosity.

Is La’au just another piece of Real Estate?

Tuesday, August 7th, 2007

A cultural perspective 

Just as it would be inconceivable to tear down the Sisteen Chapel or the Western  Temple wall in Jerusalem, likewise, it is just as inconceivable to pave over and develop the lands of La’au.  Even the destruction of a small church, synagogue or mosque is something that most would consider unacceptable, regardless of ones own religious orientation. What is unique and probably the most difficult aspect to perceive by those outside of the Hawaiian culture is that the land itself is what is most sacred.  

The metaphor that I have heard on several occasions refers to La’au as a child and the brothers and sisters of this child being Ka’ana, Kawakiu, Naiwa, and the other lands that will supposedly be saved under the Molokai Land Trust. We are told if we will sacrifice the child La’au and allow her to be molested and beaten to death, then we can keep the other children.  Would anyone consider sacrificing one of their own children in such a way in order that the others would live? To those who posses the traditional knowledge of the Kupuna, the ‘aina is ‘ohana, and this is why such a tradeoff will never be acceptable. 

“Ho’i i ka Pono” or “Return to the Pono” is the call that is being given at this time. The foundation of “Ho'i i ka Pono” is about setting into action a living model that will perpetuate pono in the spirit and life of the land and the people. The most common translation of pono is righteousness, however the word has many layers of meaning. One such understanding of pono is balance, a balance between God, Man, and the malama or stewardship of the land.   

Although  “Ho’i i ka Pono” involves the purchase of Molokai Ranch lands, it is not about real estate. It is about a collective effort to manage our island resources.  Under the traditional governing body of the ‘Aha Kiole, every district on the island would be involved and have a voice. And though Ho’i i ka Pono represents a return to traditional Hawaiian values, it is not about segregation, it is about unity. Regardless of ethnic background we are of one ‘ohana honua. All of us have important talents and gifts to contribute. 

Under this banner we will strive to see our lands returned and La’au as well as all of our culturally important areas permanently protected, and once again the people of Molokai will be restored to their rightful position as the caretakers of this island.  

The book of Second Chronicles makes it clear that if we will seek to know Ke Akua and if we will humble ourselves, begin to pray and live in pono, our lands  will be healed and restored. (2 Chronicles 7:14)  In truth, this is how we will bring prosperity and abundance to our island. Our best laid plans can not match up to the success that would follow the practice of this basic understanding. At this time we must pule and ask Ke Akua to reveal to us a deep sense of this pono so that it may rest in our collective na’au. Unified, Molokai is an unstoppable force! 

Ha’ule ka Lewa, Ha’ule ka Lani, Ho’ale ka lepo popolo

A time will come when the ali’I  will fall and be no more, but a time will come when the maka‘ainana (commoner)  will rise up and be restored 

These prophetic words were spoken by the Kahuna of Puku’i Heiau in the time of the ali’i Kahuumanu.  As told by Kumu John Ka’imikaua through the knowledge given to him by  Kawahinekapuheleikapokane

MOLOKAI RANCH’S 800-PAGE IMPACT REPORT

Tuesday, January 30th, 2007

Residents testifying at 5-hour Molokai Planning Commission meeting target many issues raised in Ranch document. Alternative to La’au development urged.


“What’s the difference in the last couple of years when the Department of Hawaiian Homes denied our family’s request to subdivide our homestead lot because of the lack of water, and now Molokai Ranch is proposing to use our water to develop 200 lots at La’au,” questioned Noa Horner, one of six children raised by Roy and Faith Horner on the family’s 40-acre homestead lot in Ho’olehua.

Molokai’s limited water resource was just one of several issues in Molokai Ranch’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that was questioned by residents during the Molokai Planning Commission’s lengthy January 24 meeting held at Mitchell Pauole Center.

Other issues charged with being inadequate or misleading included social and cultural impacts, economics, access to the shoreline, the community’s involvement in developing the plan, sustained agricultural, lack of legal documents to support the Ranch’s intentions under the plan, the environment, the endangered monk seal population at La’au, quality of life, and the effect the La’au development will have on Hawaiians from within.

Molokai Ranch, in partnership with the Molokai Enterprise Community and the EC's Land Use Committee, worked for two-years in developing the proposed Master Plan for Molokai Ranch’s land holdings. The two most controversial issues surrounding the plan are water and the development of an oceanfront, luxury residential subdivision along six miles of the pristine western and southern shorelines that intersect at La’au Point.

Water and La'au Point were hot issues from the start, yet Molokai Ranch CEO Peter Nicholas did not want to address these issues until the end of the process. Nicolas has recently been promoted by Ranch parent company Brierley Investments to help out with that company’s flagship properties in London, England.

Throughout the evening testifiers commented on the issues: “Where’s the water, our streams are drying up”….``our kids need more activities so we need more big homes, rich homes, fabulous homes so our kids can go maha’oi ”….”.Molokai is the last Hawaiian Place in the world”…..”Not only is Molokai the best place to raise our kids, but we are the luckiest people in the Hawaiian Islands”…..”People die for the desert, people die for the Arctic, and do you think we’re gonna give away paradise??Hell No!”…….”our Hawaiian people never say anything and that’s why we lost everything”….”There’s got to be an alternative to La’au, we’ve just got to work hard to find one.”

CULTURAL CONCERNS

Opuulani Albino, whose family goes back six generations from the time her Kupuna came to Molokai from Waikapu, felt the cultural impact issue wasn’t addressed “in a complete manner”. Albino said that her family does not support the planned development for La’au.

Albino testified that she had seen the Ranch’s plans for La’au early in the process when she was a member of the Burial Council for Molokai. “I thought the Ranch would not go through with its La’au Point plan because of the concerns about the development expressed by our Burial Council.”

Concerns over the desecration of the La’au Point area with the development of luxury housing touched a nerve with several testifiers. “How you going to preserve La’au and still build your million dollars homes there?” questioned Josh Pastrana. “That area is full of wahipana (sacred sites). The desecration of our kupuna’s iwi has got to stop…it’s not Pono. There some places you can’t go and some things you just can’t have.”

Lawrence Aki, a Native Hawaiian and member of the EC’s Land Use Committee that worked for two years on the Master Plan, felt La’au was not a place to develop.

While training as an Hawaiian Aki said he was always told, “when the intellect is in trouble with the intuition then something is wrong and when the na’au is not feeling good then there is definitely something wrong.”

Aki was one of six members of the EC’s Land Use Committee who voted against recommending approval to the EC Board of the Ranch Master Plan. Others not voting for the plan basically because of the plan’s La’au component were Moke Kim, DeGray Vanderbilt, Kekama Helm, Walter Ritte, and Halona Kaopuiki. Two other members abstained from voting, Matt Yamashita and Davianna McGregor. Kaopuki has since changed his stance and supports the development of La`au.

WATER AND AGRICULTURE

“I’m here for agriculture,” announced homesteader Martin Kahae. “Money is threatening our agricultural water. When I see what’s going on with La’au I’m thinking that people have killed agriculture with La’au….its almost like the ranch gave up on agriculture.”

One testifier claimed that at a public meeting, Molokai Ranch CEO Peter Nicholas told him, “agriculture is dead here (on Molokai)”.

Kahae’s goals are consistent with the goals for agriculture set forth in the Molokai Community Plan and the Maui County General Plan. Not only is the preservation of agricultural lands a priority in these documents, but also the need to preserve Molokai’s water resources so that these agricultural lands will be able to be productive in the future is a stated objective.

And that’s where the problem comes in according to Glenn Teves. “ We’re in the middle of a serious water crisis,” claimed Teves, a homesteader who has been reviewing Environmental Impact Statements for 30 years. “The Ranch’s DEIS confirms that the company has no commitment for water, no alternatives for water and their stated estimates of water needs for La’au and their Master Plan are purposely low to sell their plan to the community.”

West end resident Steve Morgan unveiled a display map that opened some eyes about water needs at the Kaluakoi Resort that have not been accounted for in the Ranch’s water needs assessment.

The map revealed that on lands owned by the ranch north of the existing Kaluakoi hotel site, there are six undeveloped and zoned hotel sites, along with a multitude of undeveloped commercial, residential, rural and multi-family sites that are designated for development in Molokai’s current community plan. When developed, these properties could result in more than three times as many house lots as being proposed at La’au.

On top of these ranch development opportunities, Morgan stated that the existing large agricultural lots in the Moana Makani and Papohaku Ranchland Subdivisions can legally be subdivided. There are 306 existing large ag lots in these two subdivisions covering 4,500 acres of Kaluakoi resort land. Further subdivision could potentially lead to a total of over 1,500 homes being developed in these two exisiting subdivisions – in addition to the development of La`au Point.

The DEIS document reflects that the existing homeowners in these ag subdivisions use 3,000 gallons of water each day.

Morgan’s display map was entitled “One Last Development?”, a take on how the Ranch initially portrayed the La’au Point development.

“Is this one last development?”, questioned Penny Martin, a homesteader who was inspired to testify while listening to others. “Hasn’t every development on Molokai been the last development?”

The Ranch should have talked about the water first”, said Wayde Lee. “I’d be a hypocrite if I would say one last development for all the time I stood and testified that there’s not enough water and now I’m going to say get enough water for La’au”.

ALTERNATIVE PLANS TO LA’AU

Many testifiers focused on their objections on one component of the Plan and the rippling impacts that it would have on the entire island. That component is the luxury home development along the unspoiled shorelines surrounding La’au Point that potentially could be the site of 400 luxury homes.

Some testifiers said it seemed that if you are against La’au that means you are against the ranch’s Master Plan. For most this is not the case. La’au is the hot button issue.

Jane Lee, who described herself as “one of the old warriors,” thanked Akaku for televising so many of the La’au Point meetings so that those unable to attend the meetings regularly could be kept informed.

“We’re shut-ins,” Lee said.” Sometimes we can’t come to the meetings because we’re not well enough or by nighttime we go down with the sun.”

Lee said that that she was not for the La’au Point plan. She said she didn’t take that position from the beginning, but only after I listened to “the debates and discussions”.

Lee expressed how painful it is for her to witness the split in among the activist leaders in the community who fought so hard to preserve Molokai’s traditions and lifestyle. “Together they were a mighty force, “ she said. “Separated it is very confusing because they both know each others strategies.”

“Instead of beefing with each other let’s come up with a plan that we can agree on”, urged Lee. “We have not really worked on an alternative to the La’au development.”

Noa Horner threw out a question to the Ranch representatives sitting in the audience. “Is La`au the only out for the Ranch as far opening the Kaluakoi hotel, or might their be other ways to financially supporting the opening of the hotel?”

Makaila Purdy said she and most people she knows support the hotel, but she seemed to feel that the ranch was using the hotel improperly to leverage the need for its plans at La’au. She asked why the ranch was so secretive about a recent golf tournament to support the reopening of the Kaluakoi hotel.

Purdy also said she attended several meetings and often heard Peter Nicholas, the Ranch’s CEO, say “the community was to decide if the La’au Point development was to be approved or disapproved.” She wondered what happened to that plan.

MOVING FORWARD

Despite all the concerns expressed over La'au Point, a ray of hope seemed to shine through that an alternative to the La’au Point component to the Master Plan could be found. This hope was summed up not only in the testimony of kupuna Jane Lee, but also in the heartfelt remarks of an 8-year-old who already fears for the impacts on her lifestyle now – and into the future.

Said Lee: “I think given the people on both sides of the La’au issue and how creative and innovative they are and how they know our island works, they can come up with something much, much better that fits our island….something we all can support, built with the spirit of Molokai….something that allows us to preserve what we love best about this island,”

That sentiment was echoed by 8-year-old Kamaleihiwa Purdy, who made the long march to La’au with 400 others recently to express their love for the ‘aina and their concerns for the development planned. Kamaleihiwa’s testimony was simple, but to the point.

“Malama La`au,” she urged.

Molokai Land Trust Questions and Answers

Thursday, December 14th, 2006

The following questions were submitted to Molokai Land Trust Board president, Colette Machado on October 4, 2006. These questions were answered in the following text which was returned to the Molokai Dispatch on Friday, December 8, 2006:

MOLOKAI LAND TRUST UPDATE
December 7, 2006


1. What is the status of the Molokai Land Trust?

The Molokai Land Trust (MLT) is a nonprofit organization incorporated as a Hawai`i non
profit corporation on June 14, 2006 and is capable of conducting business in the state of
Hawai`i as a nonprofit. The incorporation articles are filed with the State’s Department of
Consumer and Corporate Affairs and are available to the public.

Tobacco prevention for native cultures — my trip to New Zealand

Monday, December 4th, 2006

Because of my previous work with youth tobacco prevention, I was chosen by the World Health Organization (WHO) to travel to New Zealand in November to serve as a temporary WHO adviser and to share my mana`o and work that I do as a young native Hawaiian.

When I arrived at the Manurewa Marae in New Zealand, I met other amazing indigenous peoples ranging from Indians to Argentineans. In the light of the high levels of tobacco consumption among indigenous communities, the WHO and the Ministry of Health of New Zealand in collaboration with Te Reo Marama (Maori Smoke Free Coalition) organized this meeting. I was there not more than two hours when I was interviewed for the Maori TV and radio stations. 

The objectives of this conference were to have indigenous populations share practical experiences and lessons learned in the area of the tobacco control policies/programs and to develop general guidelines for tobacco control among indigenous communities.

Sustainable living the best way to save the land, says Hawaiian actor

Sunday, November 12th, 2006

Acting and sustainable farming for Jason Scott Lee aren’t as disparate as they may seem. Both, he says, embody the same general concept: “Less is more.”

Lee, a martial arts movie star and sustainable farmer, spoke at Wednesday night’s Community Movie Night at the Mitchell Pauole Center, becoming one of the most prominent opponents of the La`au Point development. While Lee himself, an Oahu native, has only been to La`au Point once, he believes the issues facing Molokai “are the same everywhere.” Excessive development, says Lee, has created too strong a burden on the state’s resources.

But Lee’s solution isn’t to return to the way things were say 50 years ago, or even keep things the way they are right now. Preserving La`au Point as just a fishing and hunting area, says Lee, takes “a very small view” of the land as a whole. “We have to change the way we think,” he says.

In many ways, Lee’s own metamorphosis from actor to martial artist to sustainable farmer embodies the same natural growth model he hopes to implement not just here in Molokai but elsewhere in the state. Lee says he first began exploring minimalist concepts when he began acting some 20 years ago. Actors typically avoid exaggerated facial expressions and gestures, says Lee.

But for Lee minimalism became more than a career path. It became a spiritual one. At the age of 26, says Lee, he began studying the martial arts (which eventually paved the way for a leading role in the 1993 film, “Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story”). Martial arts, says Lee, helped him heal his own body and mind. To become a true Kung Fu master, however, Lee needed to look beyond his own physical limitations. “After you heal yourself then you have your surroundings to take care of,” he says.

For Lee, this meant a pilgrimage to Japan where he met and studied under Masanobu Fukuoku, often credited as the father of sustainable agriculture. “You have to do it to learn it,” says Lee, referring to natural farming techniques.

Through his studies, Lee became increasingly appalled by Hawaii’s reliance on foods imported from both mainland American and neighboring countries. Cuba, he says, is an island nation much like Molokai. But unlike Molokai, Cuba is experiencing a food revolution. About 80 percent of that country’s produce, he says, is organic and homegrown.

Now, Lee has himself become a teacher, conducting workshops on Oahu and working with high school students to develop sustainable food models. His endorsement of plans that call for finding alternatives to the development of La`au Point signifies Lee’s latest endeavor as a self-designated ambassador of Hawaii.

Lee also has his own thoughts on how to develop Molokai’s West end – not through tourist resorts and multimillion dollar houses, but farms. Molokai residents, says Lee, could create a three-tier system of vegetation: ground cover such as alfalfa on the first level, short brush such as berries on the second, and fast-growing canopy trees on the third. The system, says Lee, wouldn’t require fertilizers, pesticides, or even maintenance. “You could grow things wild,” he says. The idea, he adds, is just one of many alternatives to commercially developing the area.

Growth, says Lee, is not a new or even a bad concept. Nor, he adds, is introducing new cultures to the islands. But the values, he stresses, must stay consistent from generation to generation. Only then, says Lee, can Hawaiians begin “to understand what it is to be in connection with the aina.”